via https://ift.tt/2Ui0KT3
lady-thor-foster:
STILL THE BEST SCENE IN THIS MOVIE
(Your picture was not posted)
lady-thor-foster:
STILL THE BEST SCENE IN THIS MOVIE
(Your picture was not posted)
Aug. 31st, 2019
via https://ift.tt/2NCOX0e
naamahdarling:
aniseandspearmint:
thefingerfuckingfemalefury:
cryoverkiltmilk:
tandembicycles:
cybermax:
coolcatgroup:
swordandthread:
i solemnly swear i’m up to no good
HOLY SHIT
The Goblin is trying to get the shiny treasures that hang from the ceiling.
![[profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
quantumghosts
#how long do you think that cat has wanted to touch those shimmery orbs?#How long do you think it’s looked up at that light fixture and thought Someday or If only#But that day#Some human left a chair#right in the spot#and that cat#that magnificent chicken leg of an animal saw it’s opportunity#it carefully scaled that chair#it balanced on the tippy top#and it reached for it’s dreams
these are important tags
Live your dreams you funky little goblin
She NEEEEDS the SHINIES
Magnificent chicken leg.
(Your picture was not posted)
naamahdarling:
aniseandspearmint:
thefingerfuckingfemalefury:
cryoverkiltmilk:
tandembicycles:
cybermax:
coolcatgroup:
swordandthread:
i solemnly swear i’m up to no good
HOLY SHIT
The Goblin is trying to get the shiny treasures that hang from the ceiling.
quantumghosts#how long do you think that cat has wanted to touch those shimmery orbs?#How long do you think it’s looked up at that light fixture and thought Someday or If only#But that day#Some human left a chair#right in the spot#and that cat#that magnificent chicken leg of an animal saw it’s opportunity#it carefully scaled that chair#it balanced on the tippy top#and it reached for it’s dreams
these are important tags
Live your dreams you funky little goblin
She NEEEEDS the SHINIES
Magnificent chicken leg.
(Your picture was not posted)
via https://ift.tt/2zGD5lG
laughconfetti:
arnold-ziffel:
So true… and not just for cats…
*gasp* the grumpy one is soft for the ray of sunshine
(Your picture was not posted)
laughconfetti:
arnold-ziffel:
So true… and not just for cats…
*gasp* the grumpy one is soft for the ray of sunshine
(Your picture was not posted)
via https://ift.tt/32jGAe8
crocky-wock:
bosmer:
cocainesocialist:
veteranmortal:
noislandofdreams:
cocainesocialist:
one of the most annoying things about royal weddings is all the middle class liberals who come out with their tepid takes about how they ‘don’t mind the royals, actually’ as if a liberal having no problem with unearned wealth and privilege is some massive shocker
Innit. Especially now these two are ‘socially conscious’, the mc liberals can really give that royal arse a good tonguing. The Queen knows what she’s doing, she’s adapting the monarchy to the times. They could go on for another 50 years like this.
The royal family existing is profitable for the UK as a whole, because it basically funds half the tourism industry. They’re obnoxious, but getting rid of them would actively harm the working class in many of the places most hostile to the working class. Get off your bloody high horse.
actually socialising their wealth would benefit the working class directly and we’d get even more tourists when the palaces are fully open to the public, like in the other countries that have done the sensible thing and gotten rid of their monarchies.
In 2016/2017 just under 2,000,000 people visited ‘royal properties’. Meanwhile in 2015/2016, 7,000,000 people visited the British Museum alone. In 2015 nothing related to the monarchy came close to the top 10 most visited attractions in the UK. The ‘monarcy bring money in’ is a myth, in 2016 Flamingo Land was visited more than any palace.
The ‘royal family’ cost about £350,000,000 a year, which is an unjustifiable amount of money considering that since 2010, people using food banks has jumped from 41,000 to 1,200,000.
Reblogging for the last.
(Your picture was not posted)
crocky-wock:
bosmer:
cocainesocialist:
veteranmortal:
noislandofdreams:
cocainesocialist:
one of the most annoying things about royal weddings is all the middle class liberals who come out with their tepid takes about how they ‘don’t mind the royals, actually’ as if a liberal having no problem with unearned wealth and privilege is some massive shocker
Innit. Especially now these two are ‘socially conscious’, the mc liberals can really give that royal arse a good tonguing. The Queen knows what she’s doing, she’s adapting the monarchy to the times. They could go on for another 50 years like this.
The royal family existing is profitable for the UK as a whole, because it basically funds half the tourism industry. They’re obnoxious, but getting rid of them would actively harm the working class in many of the places most hostile to the working class. Get off your bloody high horse.
actually socialising their wealth would benefit the working class directly and we’d get even more tourists when the palaces are fully open to the public, like in the other countries that have done the sensible thing and gotten rid of their monarchies.
In 2016/2017 just under 2,000,000 people visited ‘royal properties’. Meanwhile in 2015/2016, 7,000,000 people visited the British Museum alone. In 2015 nothing related to the monarchy came close to the top 10 most visited attractions in the UK. The ‘monarcy bring money in’ is a myth, in 2016 Flamingo Land was visited more than any palace.
The ‘royal family’ cost about £350,000,000 a year, which is an unjustifiable amount of money considering that since 2010, people using food banks has jumped from 41,000 to 1,200,000.
Reblogging for the last.
(Your picture was not posted)
via https://ift.tt/2NM8eMH
master-sass-blast:
swolerbear:
swolerbear:
richardmadclen:
richardmadclen:
so weightwatchers released an app for kids - a diet app for kids (!!!!) down to the age of eight (8) years old.
this is literally an app that is supposed to have children track their food intake, and their energy output, every damn day, with the purpose of them losing weight. it does before and after photos, and uses this system that is a “stoplight system”, so bad foods are red, medium is yellow and good is green.
when you sign up you have to put in your goal and one of the choices is “to make my parents proud”.
this is basically an app designed to shame children, and indoctrinate eating disorders into them.
what the hell is wrong with people????!!!!
also, apparently oprah is supporting this shit so screw her.
i am so damn mad. this is child abuse, and the weightwatchers cult is making money off of it.
here’s a petition to have the app taken down
WHAT THE FUCK
I CANNOT ADEQUATELY DESCRIBE HOW ANGRY THIS MAKES ME
CHILD ABUSE??? THERE’S AN APP FOR THAT
I can see… the intentions… of wanting kids to eat healthier…
But this is just…
No.
So much no.
Absolutely not.
(Your picture was not posted)
master-sass-blast:
swolerbear:
swolerbear:
richardmadclen:
richardmadclen:
so weightwatchers released an app for kids - a diet app for kids (!!!!) down to the age of eight (8) years old.
this is literally an app that is supposed to have children track their food intake, and their energy output, every damn day, with the purpose of them losing weight. it does before and after photos, and uses this system that is a “stoplight system”, so bad foods are red, medium is yellow and good is green.
when you sign up you have to put in your goal and one of the choices is “to make my parents proud”.
this is basically an app designed to shame children, and indoctrinate eating disorders into them.
what the hell is wrong with people????!!!!
also, apparently oprah is supporting this shit so screw her.
i am so damn mad. this is child abuse, and the weightwatchers cult is making money off of it.
here’s a petition to have the app taken down
WHAT THE FUCK
I CANNOT ADEQUATELY DESCRIBE HOW ANGRY THIS MAKES ME
CHILD ABUSE??? THERE’S AN APP FOR THAT
I can see… the intentions… of wanting kids to eat healthier…
But this is just…
No.
So much no.
Absolutely not.
(Your picture was not posted)